Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
Spinning
58.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €48.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000 HGS
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 edges out Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (7.04 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.0:1 and a weight of 215g / 7.58oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI and Daiwa Tanacom 500?
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7.58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.29 out of 10 (79cm / 31.10 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX
