Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
Spinning
58.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €48.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000 HGS
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
46.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight219g / 7.73oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/290
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (79cm / 31.10 inch) and maximum drag (3kg / 6.61oz). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6.61oz), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 6.29 out of 10 (79cm / 31.10 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX
