Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Delphin SHARX 3000X

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
Spinning
58.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €48.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000 HGS
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight239g / 8.43oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/390
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI and Delphin SHARX 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI offers a line retrieve per crank of 79cm / 31.10 inch, while Delphin SHARX 3000X stands out for a durability of 7 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI and Delphin SHARX?
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6.61oz), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 6.29 out of 10 (79cm / 31.10 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Delphin SHARX 3000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC
