Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Delphin SHARX 4000X

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
Spinning
58.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €48.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000 HGS
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI and Delphin SHARX 4000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI offers a line retrieve per crank of 79cm / 31.10 inch, while Delphin SHARX 4000X stands out for a durability of 7 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI and Delphin SHARX?
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6.61oz), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 6.29 out of 10 (79cm / 31.10 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Delphin SHARX 4000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
