Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
Spinning
58.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €48.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000 HGS
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and durability (5.89 out of 10). While Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7.58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
