Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
Spinning
58.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €48.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000 HGS
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
82.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €359.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs). While Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX
