Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84 lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000 HG
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/210. 0.30/130, 0.35/100 lb/yds: 6/230, 8/170, 10/140

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
85.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.55 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight135g / 4.76oz
Line retireve per crank63 centimeter / 24.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX edges out Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.57 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing and a line retrieve per crank of 91cm / 35.83 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
- 8.6 out of 10 (91cm / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Penn Battle III 3000X
