Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84 lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000 HG
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/210. 0.30/130, 0.35/100 lb/yds: 6/230, 8/170, 10/140

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.54 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight138g / 4.87oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x edges out Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.6 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing and a line retrieve per crank of 91cm / 35.83 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
- 8.6 out of 10 (91cm / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX
