Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84 lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000 HG
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/210. 0.30/130, 0.35/100 lb/yds: 6/230, 8/170, 10/140

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI and Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI offers a maximum drag of 9kg / 19.84 lbs, while Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19.84 lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX
