Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI

Spinning

68.90 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.17 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84 lbs

Weight250g / 8.82oz

Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €52.80
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC3000 HG
Handle typeHandle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/210. 0.30/130, 0.35/100 lb/yds: 6/230, 8/170, 10/140

Abu GARCIA Zenon

Spinning

83.30 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.47 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs

Weight160g / 5.64oz

Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch

Ball bearings11

Technical Specifications

BrandABU GARCIA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €326.00
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000 SH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Conclusion

Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX edges out Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.33 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 9kg / 19.84 lbs and a ball bearings of 3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI and Abu GARCIA Zenon?

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI

With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19.84 lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues