Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84 lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000 HG
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/210. 0.30/130, 0.35/100 lb/yds: 6/230, 8/170, 10/140

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (9.03 out of 10). While Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
