Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI

Spinning

68.90 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.17 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84 lbs

Weight250g / 8.82oz

Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €52.80
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC3000 HG
Handle typeHandle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/210. 0.30/130, 0.35/100 lb/yds: 6/230, 8/170, 10/140

Daiwa 22 Exist LT

Spinning

84.40 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.5 out of 10

Gear ratio4.9:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight150g / 5.29oz

Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch

Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €635.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000D-P
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX edges out Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.44 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 91cm / 35.83 inch and a ball bearings of 3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI

8.6 out of 10 (91cm / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues