Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84 lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000 HG
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/210. 0.30/130, 0.35/100 lb/yds: 6/230, 8/170, 10/140

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI and Daiwa TANACOM 1200X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Daiwa TANACOM 1200X stands out for a durability of 5.72 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI and Daiwa TANACOM?
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8.82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.6 out of 10 (91cm / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX
