Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI, Spinning reel with front drag
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84 lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €52.80
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC3000 HG
  • Handle typeHandle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/210. 0.30/130, 0.35/100 lb/yds: 6/230, 8/170, 10/140
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD, 4012, left hand, Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10419-412
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Feeder And Match
61.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag8kg
Weight440g / 15.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €95.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4012
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.29/150

Conclusion

Both Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI and Daiwa TD FEEDER QD perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI offers a weight of 250g / 8.82oz, while Daiwa TD FEEDER QD stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI and Daiwa TD FEEDER QD?

There are not much differences between the two comparables