Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84 lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000 HG
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/210. 0.30/130, 0.35/100 lb/yds: 6/230, 8/170, 10/140

Daiwa TD Match
Feeder And Match
64.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €153.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI and Daiwa TD Match 4012X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI offers a maximum drag of 9kg / 19.84 lbs, while Daiwa TD Match 4012X stands out for a ball bearings of 4. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI and Daiwa TD Match?
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19.84 lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8.82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X
