Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84 lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000 HG
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/210. 0.30/130, 0.35/100 lb/yds: 6/230, 8/170, 10/140

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI and Penn Battle III 8000 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI offers a line retrieve per crank of 91cm / 35.83 inch, while Penn Battle III 8000 HSX stands out for a durability of 8.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI and Penn Battle III?
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8.82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.6 out of 10 (91cm / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X
