Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84 lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000 HG
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/210. 0.30/130, 0.35/100 lb/yds: 6/230, 8/170, 10/140

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the maximum drag (9kg / 19.84 lbs). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 7 and a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19.84 lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX
