Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84 lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000 HG
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/210. 0.30/130, 0.35/100 lb/yds: 6/230, 8/170, 10/140

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
73.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI and Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX
