Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX
Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag
Spinning
57.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag2.5 kg - 5.51 lbs
Weight315 g - 11.1oz
Line retireve per crank88 cm / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings4 Shielded Stainless Steel
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €99.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18-290 / 0,20-240 / 0,25-160 / 0,30-105 lb/yds: 6-200 / 8-140 / 10-120
Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
78.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX clearly outshines Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag, offering significantly better performance in weight (280g / 9,88oz) and ergonomics (6.07 out of 10). While Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons
Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Penn Battle III 3000X
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX
Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX
Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa BG 6500X
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X