Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX

Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
Spinning
58.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics4.03 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag2.5 kg - 5.5 lbs
Weight290 g - 10.3oz
Line retireve per crank82 cm / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €89.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeRead drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18-290 / 0,20-240 / 0,25-160 / 0,30-105 lb/yds: 6-200 / 8-140 / 10-120
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT, 4000-CP, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10223-405
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
60.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €74.80
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000-CP
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Both Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag offers a gear ratio of 5.0:1, while Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables