Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX

Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
Spinning
58.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics4.03 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag2.5 kg - 5.5 lbs
Weight290 g - 10.3oz
Line retireve per crank82 cm / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €89.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeRead drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18-290 / 0,20-240 / 0,25-160 / 0,30-105 lb/yds: 6-200 / 8-140 / 10-120
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT, 2500D, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10610-250
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €179.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500D
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX clearly outshines Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and total score (8.2 out of 10). While Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables