Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX

Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
Spinning
58.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics4.03 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag2.5 kg - 5.5 lbs
Weight290 g - 10.3oz
Line retireve per crank82 cm / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18-290 / 0,20-240 / 0,25-160 / 0,30-105 lb/yds: 6-200 / 8-140 / 10-120

Daiwa Regal LT
Spinning
46.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag clearly outshines Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (3+1) and line retrieve per crank (82 cm / 32.3 inch). While Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag and Daiwa Regal LT?
Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 cm / 32.3 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
