Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
Spinning
58.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics4.03 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag2.5 kg - 5.5 lbs
Weight290 g - 10.3oz
Line retireve per crank82 cm / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18-290 / 0,20-240 / 0,25-160 / 0,30-105 lb/yds: 6-200 / 8-140 / 10-120

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
50.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4 kg
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.28mm/220m
Conclusion
Both Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag offers a ball bearings of 3+1, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag stands out for a ergonomics of 6.13 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X
