Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX

Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
Spinning
58.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics4.03 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag2.5 kg - 5.5 lbs
Weight290 g - 10.3oz
Line retireve per crank82 cm / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18-290 / 0,20-240 / 0,25-160 / 0,30-105 lb/yds: 6-200 / 8-140 / 10-120

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX edges out Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.3:1) and the durability (5.5 out of 10). Still, Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3+1 and a line retrieve per crank of 82 cm / 32.3 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag and Penn Slammer IV?
Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
- With a score like 8.07 out of 10 (290 g - 10.3oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 cm / 32.3 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X
