Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX

Shimano Super 4000 GT RD
Spinning
37.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag3.0 kg - 6.6 lbs
Weight355 g - 12.5oz
Line retireve per crank86 cm / 33.9 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25-260 / 0.30-180 / 0.35-130 / 0.40-100 lb/yds: 8-240 / 10-200 / 12-160

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX clearly outshines Shimano Super 4000 GT RD, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Super 4000 GT RD may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Super 4000 GT RD and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX
