Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
Multireels
91.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1 / 2.0:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1200g / 42.33oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €307.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT
Feeder And Match
3000-c (match)x
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.98 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05 lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €49.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C (Match)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Shimano Tyrnos 30 II clearly outshines Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (9.14 out of 10). While Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Tyrnos 30 II is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 30 II and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT?
Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
- Rated 8.51 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons
Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750
Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X
Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X