Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
Multireels
91.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1 / 2.0:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1200g / 42.33oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €307.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tyrnos 30 II and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tyrnos 30 II offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 30 II and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- Rated 8.26 out of 10 (305g / 10,76oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
