Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
Multireels
91.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1 / 2.0:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1200g / 42.33oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €307.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tyrnos 30 II and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tyrnos 30 II offers a ball bearings of 4 ARB, while Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 30 II and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4 ARB), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- Rated 8.29 out of 10 (300g / 10,58oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25
Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX
Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX
Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX
Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX
Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX
Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX