Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
Multireels
91.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1 / 2.0:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1200g / 42.33oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €307.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
88.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €668.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tyrnos 30 II and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tyrnos 30 II offers a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 30 II and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4 ARB), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
