Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
Multireels
91.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1 / 2.0:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1200g / 42.33oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €307.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Shimano Tyrnos 30 II edges out Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs). Still, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 76 centimeter / 29.92 inch and a weight of 175g / 6,17oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 30 II and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
