Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
Multireels
91.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1 / 2.0:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1200g / 42.33oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €307.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Shimano Tyrnos 30 II edges out Shimano AERO XR 4000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the gear ratio (5.0:1 / 2.0:1). Still, Shimano AERO XR 4000X holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch and a weight of 245g / 8,64oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 30 II and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- Rated 8.6 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- With a line retrieve of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch (5.71 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX
