Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT
Spinning
4000 D-cx
84.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €176.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Daiwa 17 Prorex LT?
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
