Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
60.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS edges out Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (7.89 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch and a weight of 235g / 8,29oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT?
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX
- With a score like 8.43 out of 10 (235g / 8,29oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX
