Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
64.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.61 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €72.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS edges out Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (7.89 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch and a weight of 290g / 10,23oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT?
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
- Rated 8.34 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX
