Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX edges out Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) and the ball bearings (8). Still, Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 19kg / 41.89 lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX
