Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX
