Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX stands out for a weight of 195g / 6,88oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X
