Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX edges out Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) and the weight (230g / 8,11oz). Still, Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 19kg / 41.89 lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX
