Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX edges out Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter) and the weight (170g / 6oz). Still, Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4 ARB and a maximum drag of 19kg / 41.89 lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4 ARB), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X
