Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 76 centimeter / 29.92 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX
