Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT
Spinning
63.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €51.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeLT4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS edges out Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (7.89 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch and a weight of 270g / 9,52oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT?
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX
- With a score like 8.2 out of 10 (270g / 9,52oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X
