Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
63.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €45.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS edges out Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (7.89 out of 10). Still, Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch and a weight of 250g / 8,82oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Daiwa Ninja LT?
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
