Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
58.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.13/200
Conclusion
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS clearly outshines Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (7.89 out of 10). While Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Daiwa RX LT?
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4 ARB), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
- With a score like 8.17 out of 10 (275g / 9,7oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX
