Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €114.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Shimano AERO XR C3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano AERO XR C3000X stands out for a weight of 210g / 7,41oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano AERO XR C3000X
- Rated 8.8 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- With a line retrieve of 73 centimeter / 28.74 inch (5.43 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX
