Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Shimano AERO XR C5000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano AERO XR C5000X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX
