Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Shimano AERO XR C5000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano AERO XR C5000X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
