Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440

Shimano FX
Spinning
48.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank71 centimeter / 27.95 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS clearly outshines Shimano FX 2500 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (19kg / 41.89 lbs). While Shimano FX 2500 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Shimano FX?
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano FX 2500 FCX
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.14 out of 10 (71 centimeter / 27.95 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX
