Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS offers a gear ratio of 4.0:1/1.5:1, while Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
- A gear ratio of 4.0:1/1.5:1 (scoring 6.11 out of 10) gives you a nice middle ground, just enough torque to handle pressure, but still quick enough for general use
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX
