Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
Spinning
58.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €48.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000 HGS
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m
Conclusion
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS clearly outshines Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (19kg / 41.89 lbs). While Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI?
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7.58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.29 out of 10 (79cm / 31.10 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX
