Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX

Abu GARCIA Revo MGX
Spinning
20 Sp/lx
63.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag6.4kg / 14,11lbs
Weight170g / 6.38oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €255.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20 SP/L
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX edges out Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.1:1). Still, Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 84 centimeter / 33.07 inch and a weight of 170g / 6,38oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Revo MGX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX
- 7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC
